What makes technical writing good for a developer audience?

Accuracy first, then a clear path to a working result. Engineers trust writing that shows real commands, real output, and the parts that usually go wrong. Marketing language and vague benefits make them leave.

Why do DevTools companies lose deals over bad docs?

Developers evaluate tools by reading the docs before they ever talk to sales. If the docs are thin or wrong, the evaluation stalls and the deal dies quietly. The lose-deals post breaks down where this happens.

How is writing for AI products different?

AI product docs have to cover prompts, schemas, evals, and version boundaries that change fast. The new-rules post covers the structure I would use to keep them accurate as the product moves.

Should technical docs be short or thorough?

As short as possible while still getting the reader to a working result. Length for its own sake hides the important parts. The shorter-docs post makes the case with examples.